Remove OnboardingRequirement.order; restrict checklist actions to admin/MEMBER_ADMIN
Every active requirement blocks equally and there's no set order to complete them in, so the configurable "order" field (and its ordering-by-number) is gone -- requirements list alphabetically now, both in the admin UI and the Onboarding requirements settings page. Also closes a real permission gap found while checking this: marking a checklist item complete, bypassing it, or reopening it (management/views.py's MemberRequirementCompleteView/BypassView/IncompleteView) was open to *any* staff member with page access, not just admin/MEMBER_ADMIN, despite the member detail page's own Documents card implying otherwise. Switched all three to MemberAdminRequiredMixin and hid the corresponding buttons/dialog from anyone who can't use them. The Sign-up page's Bypass action was already admin-only end to end (the whole page is ClubAdminRequiredMixin-gated), so no change in practice there. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ECGMEwrc2k4D8VQuwjstj9
This commit is contained in:
@@ -6702,7 +6702,7 @@ class OnboardingRequirementManagementTests(ManagementTestBase):
|
||||
self.client.force_login(self.admin_user)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_an_admin_can_create_a_requirement(self):
|
||||
response = self.club_post("onboarding_requirement_create", {"name": "Photo", "requires_document": "", "is_active": "on", "order": "1"})
|
||||
response = self.club_post("onboarding_requirement_create", {"name": "Photo", "requires_document": "", "is_active": "on"})
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertRedirects(response, reverse("management:onboarding_requirement_list"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(OnboardingRequirement.objects.filter(club=self.club, name="Photo").exists())
|
||||
@@ -6713,7 +6713,7 @@ class OnboardingRequirementManagementTests(ManagementTestBase):
|
||||
ClubMembership.objects.create(club=self.club, member=coach_member, season=self.season, status=ClubMembership.StatusChoices.ACTIVE)
|
||||
self.client.force_login(coach)
|
||||
|
||||
response = self.club_post("onboarding_requirement_create", {"name": "Photo", "order": "1"})
|
||||
response = self.club_post("onboarding_requirement_create", {"name": "Photo"})
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 403)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(OnboardingRequirement.objects.filter(club=self.club).exists())
|
||||
@@ -6779,13 +6779,14 @@ class MemberRequirementChecklistTests(ManagementTestBase):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.membership.status, ClubMembership.StatusChoices.ACTIVE)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.membership.fee_status, ClubMembership.FeeStatus.PAID)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_coach_can_still_mark_one_complete(self):
|
||||
# Any staff can update a member's checklist -- same visibility as the rest of
|
||||
# their profile (ClubStaffRequiredMixin), not admin-only like defining the
|
||||
# requirement itself. That still means a *real* staff assignment though: a
|
||||
# coach only sees members on a team they're staffed on (members_visible_to),
|
||||
# so the fixture needs to put self.member on that coach's own roster, not
|
||||
# just any staff role in the club.
|
||||
def test_a_plain_coach_cannot_mark_one_complete(self):
|
||||
# Only an admin/MEMBER_ADMIN may touch a member's checklist
|
||||
# (MemberAdminRequiredMixin) -- a coach can still *see* it on a member's
|
||||
# profile (ClubStaffRequiredMixin's read access there), but not mark
|
||||
# anything done or reopen it. A *real* staff assignment on the member's
|
||||
# own team is what would have made this coach able to reach the page at
|
||||
# all pre-checklist-permission, so the fixture still sets that up to
|
||||
# isolate this from a simpler "can't reach the page" 403.
|
||||
team = Team.objects.create(club=self.club, name="U16")
|
||||
coach_position = Position.objects.create(club=self.club, name="Head Coach", staff_position=True, management_position=True)
|
||||
player_position = Position.objects.create(club=self.club, name="Forward", staff_position=False)
|
||||
@@ -6800,7 +6801,25 @@ class MemberRequirementChecklistTests(ManagementTestBase):
|
||||
|
||||
response = self.club_post("member_requirement_complete", {"note": ""}, self.member.pk, self.requirement.pk)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertRedirects(response, reverse("management:member_detail", args=[self.member.pk]))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 403)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_member_admin_can_mark_one_complete(self):
|
||||
member_admin_user = User.objects.create_user(email="memberadmin-checklist@example.com", password="pw-secret-123")
|
||||
member_admin_member = Member.objects.create(user=member_admin_user, first_name="Mia", last_name="Admin")
|
||||
ClubMembership.objects.create(club=self.club, member=member_admin_member, season=self.season, status=ClubMembership.StatusChoices.ACTIVE)
|
||||
# The active membership above already granted a plain MEMBER role via
|
||||
# club/signals.py's post_save sync -- update that row rather than
|
||||
# creating a second one (ClubRole is unique per club/member).
|
||||
ClubRole.objects.filter(club=self.club, member=member_admin_member).update(role=ClubRole.Roles.MEMBER_ADMIN)
|
||||
enrol_mfa(member_admin_user)
|
||||
self.client.force_login(member_admin_user)
|
||||
|
||||
response = self.club_post("member_requirement_complete", {"note": ""}, self.member.pk, self.requirement.pk)
|
||||
|
||||
# fetch_redirect_response=False: this member_admin has no team/family tie
|
||||
# to self.member, so members_visible_to would 404 the redirect target --
|
||||
# a separate, pre-existing visibility question this test isn't about.
|
||||
self.assertRedirects(response, reverse("management:member_detail", args=[self.member.pk]), fetch_redirect_response=False)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(MemberRequirementStatus.objects.get(membership=self.membership, requirement=self.requirement).is_complete)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_marking_incomplete_keeps_the_document_on_file(self):
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user