Signed-in parents get their details locked and pre-filled on the claim
form instead of retyped; approving links to their existing user and
merges into their existing family instead of creating a duplicate.
The approval screen is now a card grid with a searchable, pre-selected
child dropdown and a reason modal for rejection. The "already dealt
with" history is scoped to the current season.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two things, found together while looking at the row of controls under each
pending claim.
The child dropdown stood taller than the btn-sm/input-sm around it because
ClaimReviewForm.child hardcoded its own class="select select-bordered w-full"
on the widget. templatetags/field.html's select branch already builds the
full class list itself (base classes + the size modifier), so the widget's
own class rendered as a second, non-merging class="..." attribute right next
to the generated one -- select-sm was in the markup, just shadowed by a
duplicate attribute the browser never applied. No other Select field in the
app hardcodes a class this way, which is why nothing else had the problem.
Fixed by dropping it and passing size="small" through {% form_field %}
instead, the same way every other compact inline select in the app does.
Also pulled Approve and Reject apart with justify-between rather than letting
both sit in one flex-wrap run, so they stay on opposite sides of the row
(and don't end up adjacent on a wrap) rather than one stray click apart.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The migration path for a club arriving with a list of children from a
federation export and no parent records. Children import without logins, each
into a family of their own -- that shape *is* the "nobody is responsible for
this child" state, so there's no unclaimed flag to drift out of step with
reality, and a family drops off the worklist by itself the moment a parent
joins it. `family_role=child` with a blank `family_group` asks for that; any
other lone role is still a mistake in the file.
Verification is a human decision, deliberately. A parent submits a public form
with the child's name and date of birth as free text -- no search, no
autocomplete, and the same response whether or not the child was found, because
the page needs no login and anything that resolved the child would turn it into
a way to enumerate the club's children. An admin matches it from a queue
against a shortlist that only ever contains children with nobody on file, so
approving can never quietly re-parent a child who already has one.
The alternatives were worse. A claim code needs a delivery channel the club may
not have and is a bearer token besides. Matching on name plus birthday hands out
someone else's child to whoever guesses a birthday. The club is the only party
that actually knows its own families.
That form is also the registration: open self-registration is now closed
(shadowing account_signup rather than removing the route, so the URL name
allauth's templates reverse still resolves). The account is created on
approval, not on submission, so a public form can't fill the user table. An
approved parent lands as a guardian -- login and family link, no membership, no
fee -- gets a password-reset link, and a minimal "my family" page.
One bug worth recording: families_awaiting_a_parent first used
annotate(Count(..., filter=...)) over a queryset already filtered on the same
join, so Django reused that join for the counts and a parent with no
ClubMembership of their own -- exactly what a newly linked guardian is -- went
uncounted, leaving the family unclaimed forever. Exists subqueries avoid it. A
test pins both directions.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
